Many foreign trade companies encounter a seemingly simple but actually fatal problem when building a website:
How exactly should products be categorized?
From a corporate perspective, common practices include:
Classified by internal product line
Classified by factory production structure
Listed by model and specification
However, from the perspective of actual decision-making in overseas procurement , these classification methods often seriously violate their browsing and filtering logic , directly leading to three consequences:
Customers can't find "the type they want".
Clients cannot quickly determine whether you are "a good fit for them".
No matter how good the product is, it's difficult to generate inquiries.
This article will systematically break down the issues based on the practical experience of veteran foreign trade professionals :
How do overseas procurement teams "view product categories"?
What is the underlying basis for product categorization on an independent website?
Different product categories should employ completely different classification strategies.
How to directly improve inquiry rate and conversion probability through classification structure?
In a B2B scenario, overseas buyers visiting your website have a very clear objective :
I need to confirm:
Are you the type of supplier I'm looking for?
They're not here to "see everything," but to quickly eliminate mismatched objects .
Therefore, the core role of product category pages in independent e-commerce websites can be summarized in one sentence:
Helps purchasing decisions make a "whether to continue learning about you" judgment within 30 seconds.
If the category structure cannot support this judgment, no matter how beautiful the subsequent pages are, the conversion rate will be extremely low.

Common structures:
Product Category
Product A
Product B
Product C
This is a typical factory perspective .
But what procurement is really concerned about is:
Can this type of product solve my application problem?
Are there any models suitable for my industry/scenario?
Do you do this kind of thing regularly ?
Many websites list dozens or even hundreds of product models under a single primary category .
turn out:
The page has an extremely high information density.
The customer doesn't know "where to start."
Unable to determine your main focus
From a procurement perspective, these types of websites are often interpreted as:
"Does everything, but not necessarily specializes in anything."
Some websites have very comprehensive keyword categories, but:
The classification naming is obscure
The structural logic does not conform to the procurement path
The page lacks guidance and instructions.
The final result is:
Search engines can crawl it, but buyers can't understand it or don't want to read it.

When sourcing products from overseas, the first thing to consider is:
Do you take the lead in this type of thing?
Are you an expert supplier or a general store?
Therefore, product categorization = a tool for expressing corporate identity.
A good classification structure will make things clear to buyers at a glance:
This company makes products just like ours.
The actual procurement path is usually:
I have a business/application problem
I need a type of solution
Let's look at the specific products and specifications.
Not the other way around.
This means:
The classification should not be based solely on the product name, but rather on its "application and use".
A qualified product category page should accomplish at least three things:
Explain who this type of product is suitable for.
Tell the purchasing department how to choose
Naturally guide them to: Product Page / Solution Page / Consultation Page
Error example:
Products
Model A
Model B
Model C
What procurement truly cares about is:
What industries is it used in?
Production capacity range?
Are there any proven successful cases?
Recommended classification structure:
By Application
Food Processing Line
Chemical Industry
Packaging Industry
By Solution
Turnkey Project
Automatic Line
Custom Engineering
Core Products
👉 This structure essentially tells the purchasing department:
We don't just sell equipment; we understand the scenarios.
Error example:
Products
Part 001
Part 002
Part 003
Better structure:
By Function
By Industry (Application Industry)
By Specification (Specification Range)
And clearly state this at the top of the category page:
Applicable Standards
Customization capabilities
Minimum Order Quantity
Such products are not suitable for excessive subdivision of models .
A more effective way is:
Product Types
Custom Capability
Materials / Processes
Past Projects
The purpose of categorization is not to "display models," but rather:
Prove you have the ability and experience to be customized.
Classification Explanation
Tell the purchasing department using 2-3 jargon terms:
Who are these types of products suitable for, and what problems do they solve?
Typical applications or industry illustrations
Helping procurement personnel quickly apply their own scenarios
Product entry point + solution entry point coexist
Different procurement roles have different decision-making paths.
Competency endorsement
Years
Exporting countries
Certification
Number of cases
A clear next step for CTA
Get Solution
Request Recommendation
Contact Engineer

A trend is becoming very clear:
As more and more customers become interested in consulting AI, they're starting to assess the professionalism of your website.
AI (such as ChatGPT and AI search) places great emphasis on the following when determining whether a company is worth recommending:
Is the product structure on the official website clear?
Does the categorization reflect professionalism?
Can you clearly answer "What are you good at?"
This is why more and more foreign trade companies are choosing to start with the underlying categories and knowledge structure when restructuring their official websites.
For example, when AB Customer provides intelligent website building for B2B foreign trade companies, it doesn't simply generate pages, but rather:
First, clarify the professional classification logic of products and solutions.
Then, these structures are transformed into a page system that is friendly to both search engines and AI.
Product categorization serves both procurement decisions and acts as a comprehensible and referable knowledge entry point for GEO (Generative Engine Optimization).
in other words:
Product categorization is evolving from a "navigational structure" to a "fundamental cognitive structure for AI to identify and recommend businesses."
List all existing product categories
Ask yourself three questions:
Is this for purchasing or for internal use?
Can you tell at a glance what my main focus is?
Do you support the "next step decision"?
Add at least one more layer:
Application/Industry/Solution Dimensions
Supplementing each core category page:
Explanation
Typical applications
Inquiry portal
Ensure that the category structure is consistent with the overall content, case studies, and solutions on the official website.
How should a product page be written? Is there a golden formula? I've already explained this in detail in a previous article, which you can click here to learn more: [ One Daily Tip for Foreign Trade Website Building: No Experience Writing Product Pages? Follow This "Pain Point + Advantage + Scenario" Formula to Close Deals ]
Product categorization is not a technical issue, but a cognitive one.
It decided that:
Is the purchasing department willing to continue learning about you?
Can AI correctly understand you?
Is your official website a "product catalog" or a "professional supplier portal"?
When you truly adopt the decision-making perspective of overseas sourcing and redesign product categories,
You will find—
An increase in inquiries is often not because you have more products, but because customers finally "understand you".