In today's global trade environment, procurement professionals must be proficient in international trade terms, especially FCA, CPT and CIP, to make informed decisions and effectively manage transportation risks. Knowing exactly when liability transfers from seller to buyer can avoid costly disputes and ensure supply chain reliability.
Incoterms define the precise points at which costs and risks are transferred during transportation, thereby building trust in the procurement process. Understanding these risk transfer points helps buyers and sellers clarify responsibilities, avoid ambiguity, and optimize transportation strategies. Procurement data shows that clear risk allocation can reduce logistics delays by up to 20%, significantly cutting unexpected expenses.
FCA (Free Carrier): Under the FCA model, the seller delivers the goods, which have been cleared for export, at a designated location (usually the seller's location or the carrier's hub). Once the goods are loaded on board or handed over to the carrier, the risk is transferred to the buyer. The buyer should ensure that the selected delivery location is consistent with its logistics chain.
CPT (Carriage Paid To): The seller pays for the transportation of the goods to the named destination, but the risk is transferred to the buyer when the goods are handed over to the carrier at the point of shipment. This means that although the seller arranges and pays for the transportation, the buyer still bears the risk of shipping the goods.
CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To): Similar to CPT, CIP also requires the risk to be transferred to the buyer, but CIP also requires the seller to take out insurance to cover the buyer's risk from the point of origin to the destination. The buyer should confirm that the insurance amount is consistent with the value and risk profile of its goods to avoid any difference.
Under the FCA model, buyers usually bear the cost of loading and inland transportation at the agreed location. It is crucial to choose a reliable carrier because buyers bear the risk immediately after the goods are handed over. About 65% of the overseas buyers surveyed said that they prefer to choose direct shipment under FCA to minimize the related operational risks.
CPT requires the seller to arrange and pay for primary transportation, but the buyer must evaluate the mode of transportation to control risk after shipment. Modes of transportation with extensive tracking capabilities (such as containerized ocean or multimodal transport) can provide greater risk transparency and enable proactive response.
For CIP , the insurance terms (including coverage limits, deductibles and insured risks) must be carefully negotiated given the seller's insurance obligations. Buyers are advised to adjust insurance terms based on their own risk appetite and supply chain criticality. About 70% of exporters who adopt CIP said that claims disputes have been reduced due to good matching of insurance policies.
Consider a European importer of electronics that uses FCA to ship to an Asian supplier. Due to an inappropriate arrangement of loading responsibilities, unexpected delays occurred, and the importer paid additional demurrage. The lesson? These costs can be reduced if the FCA location is clearly agreed in advance and reviewed in conjunction with the carrier's performance.
Another case involved a US company importing textiles under CPT. The ocean carrier was late, resulting in risks during inland transportation. The buyer realized that coordinating the shipping time was critical to minimizing the risk interval after risk transfer.
Meanwhile, a Canadian agricultural exporter that relied on CIP had its claim rejected for breach of policy provisions due to improper packaging, highlighting the importance of ensuring that all parties comply with insurance terms to avoid voiding coverage.
Effectively mastering the international trade terms of FCA, CPT and CIP enables buyers and sellers to clearly divide responsibilities and ensure investment security during transportation. Choosing the right mode of transportation and insurance for risk transfer points can help build a resilient supply chain and reduce unexpected costs.
Thoroughly communicating risk points in contracts and continually monitoring shipping progress can mitigate potential losses and build lasting trust between trading partners.